When is it safe to return to driving after distal radius fracture fixation? A prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: After surgical fixation of distal radius fractures, many patients are keen to return to driving. There are however limited guidelines assisting surgeons. The aims of this study were to determine when patients could return to driving safely after distal radius fracture fixation and determine the clinical parameters (range of motion and grip strength) that patients needed to achieve before return to safe driving could be advised. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective grant-funded clinical study was conducted. Patients above the age of 21 years who underwent surgical fixation with a volar plate, possessed a class 3 standard motorcar license, and were regular drivers were recruited in a single institution from 2017 to 2019. A hand surgeon and an occupational therapist who sees routine hand therapy cases, assessed the patients at regular intervals from 2 to 12-weeks post-surgery. Clinical parameters of pain, wrist range of motion and grip strength were measured. Patients underwent off and on-road driving assessments. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients were recruited, with 21 successfully completing the driving assessment. Median time post-surgery to passing the driving test was 6 and 8-weeks for off and on-road assessments respectively. Pain score was observed to decrease over time, with a significant decrease from week 2 to week 4. Range of motion improved over time, with maximal improvement between 2 to 4-weeks post-surgery. When compared with the unaffected wrist, the difference in pronation, supination and radial deviation in the affected hand was consistently no longer statistically significant 4 to 6-weeks post-surgery. CONCLUSION: Patients with isolated surgically treated distal radius fractures can be recommended for a driving assessment as early as 4-6 weeks post-surgery if pain control is adequate, and clinical parameters for pronation and supination are met.

Assessing Older Adults' Functional Visual Performance Using the Performance Quality Rating Scale.

Visual impairment has distinct impacts on the activities of older adults. Quantifying the functional impact of visual loss would facilitate targeted rehabilitation. The objectives of this study were to: (1) develop an observational assessment of the functional visual performance of older adults using the Performance Quality Rating Scale (PQRS); (2) test the feasibility and inter-rater agreement in a pilot sample of older adults with visual impairment. A convenience sample of older adults with vision loss (N = 20) performed seven pre-selected activities. Performance was videoed (N = 126 videos) and rated by two raters using specific operational definitions. All participants completed the seven activities with the given resources and 90% of videos were successfully rated using the developed PQRS. Inter-rater agreement was substantial (weighted Kappa = 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.64, 0.79]) for all activities. The developed PQRS for functional vision is feasible, with substantial inter-rater agreement, to assess functional vision of older adults in an outpatient setting.

Assessing older adults' use of vision using the Performance Quality Rating Scale.Visual impairment has different impacts on the everyday activities of older adults. Assessing the specific impact would help therapists to provide rehabilitation targeting their daily challenges. The objectives of this study were (1) to develop an assessment of how older adults use their vision using the Performance Quality Rating Scale (PQRS); (2) to test the possibility of using, and the agreement of using this tool between two raters in a pilot sample. Twenty older adults with vision loss performed seven activities in an outpatient clinic. In total, 126 videos of their performances were rated by two raters using the PQRS. 90% of the videos were successfully rated using the developed PQRS with good agreement between the raters. The developed PQRS can possibly be used to assess how older adults use their vision for daily activities in an outpatient setting.

Stroke Recurrence among Stroke Patients Referred for Driving Assessment and Rehabilitation: A Cohort Study.

Returning to driving is one of the priorities for stroke survivors. However, the fear of the risk of recurrent stroke has led to concern about allowing driving post-stroke. This study was performed to study the impact of various vascular risk factors on stroke recurrence among drivers referred to our national referral center for Driving Assessment and Rehabilitation Program (DARP). Medical records of subjects who were diagnosed to have a stroke and were referred to DARP were retrospectively reviewed. Data on demographics (age and gender) and vascular risk factors (hypertension-HT, diabetes mellitus-DM, hyperlipidemia-HL, cigarette smoking-SM, previous stroke-PS, and heart disease-HD) were collected. Subjects were contacted and records scrutinized for a report of recurrent stroke. A total of 133 subjects were recruited, median 54 years (range 20-77 years), 95.5% male, 59.4% had HT, 32.3% DM, 65.4% HL, 43.6% SM, 3.8% PS, and 8.3% HD. Over a median follow-up of 30 months (range 1-78 months), the recurrence rate of stroke was 11.3%, 3.69/100 patient-years. On uni-variable analysis, the risk of stroke recurrence rose with age (HR 1.08, 95%CI 1.02-1.15, p = 0.01) and heart disease (HR 5.77, 95%CI 1.46-22.83, p = 0.01). On multivariable analysis, only age remained significant (HR 1.07, 95%CI 1.00-1.13, p = 0.045). Among those aged > 60 years, the HR was 3.88 (95%CI 1.35-11.20, p = 0.012). The risk of stroke recurrence is higher among older drivers and is not influenced by other vascular factors.

Return to Driving Is Safe 6 Weeks After Anterior Cervical Surgery for Symptomatic Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective Cohort Study. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine the timing and clinical parameters for a safe return to driving. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATE: Returning to driving after cervical spine surgery remains a controversial topic, with no clear consensus on how to best assess a patient's fitness to drive. Previous studies using brake reaction time or subjective questionnaires recommend a return to driving 6 weeks after surgery. METHODS: Patients above 18 years of age who underwent anterior cervical spine surgery for symptomatic cervical degenerative disk disease and possessed a valid motorcar driving license were recruited from 2018 to 2020. Neck Disability Index (NDI), modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scores, range of motion, and functional strength of the cervical spine were collected preoperatively and at 2-, 4-, 6- and 12 weeks postsurgery. Patients underwent a standard functional driving assessment protocol at the institution to determine their fitness to drive. This comprised of a clinic-based off-road screening tests and on-road driving test in a real-world environment. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were recruited. The mean age was 56.6±8.9 years. Eighty-one percent of the patients passed the on-road driving assessment at 6 weeks. Patients who passed the driving assessment had lower mean NDI scores, 3.4±3.1 versus 10.8±8.0 ( P =0.006), and higher mean mJOA scores 16.1±0.6 versus 15.0±1.8 ( P =0.045). Patients who passed the driving assessment also had higher functional cervical flexor strength, 21.1s±5.8s versus 13.0s±10.2s ( P =0.042) in a supine position but not correlated with a range of motion of the spine in all directions. CONCLUSION: Most patients undergoing single or dual-level anterior cervical surgery for symptomatic cervical degenerative disk disease demonstrate the ability to pass a standardized driving assessment and are safe to return to driving more than 6 weeks after surgery. Driving ability appears to be correlated with NDI scores ≤3 ( P =0.006), mJOA scores ≥16 ( P =0.045), and cervical flexion endurance of ≥21s ( P =0.042). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Classifying Types of Visual Loss Linked With Function to Inform Referral to Vision Rehabilitation for Older Adults in Singapore.

Objective: Visual impairment restricts performance in activities of daily living. The aim of this study was to classify types of visual loss associated with function in older adults based on clinical data and World Health Organization (WHO) acuity and visual field criteria. Methods: Seven hundred retrospective medical records of older adults seen at the outpatient ophthalmology clinics of a Singapore hospital were reviewed. Extracted data was mapped to the WHO low vision criteria. A flow chart was developed to classify the main types of visual loss aligned with function. Results: The flow chart developed describes four major types of visual loss: (1) full visual field with decreased visual acuity, (2) any visual field loss with greater than ten degrees of available field, (3) peripheral field loss with less than 10° of available field, and (4) any visual field loss due to a cortical event. Within each major type, sub-categories were identified reflecting the complexity of the visual impact of the eye conditions. Conclusion: The flow chart can be applied to outpatient records to identify older adults with different types of visual loss to inform targeted rehabilitation linked with function.

The impact of low vision on activities, participation, and goals among older adults: a scoping review.

PURPOSE: Participation is a key outcome of rehabilitation. However, no reviews have investigated the impact of low vision on the activities, participation, and goals of older adults. This paper aims to review and synthesize available literature on how low vision impacts the activity and participation of older adults. METHOD: A scoping review was conducted. The key findings were extracted from 30 full-text articles that met the selection criteria. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health was used to frame the findings at the activity and participation levels. RESULTS: At the activity level, the categories of Walking, Moving around in different locations, and Reading were commonly impacted by low vision. The main domains impacted at the participation level were Community, social and civic life and Interpersonal interaction and relationships. Only one study addressed the goals of older adults with low vision. CONCLUSION: Low vision impacts reading, walking, and moving around in different locations. Rehabilitation therapists should be aware of and consider assessing these activities. Further research is needed on the impact of low vision on other functional activities, participation, and self-identified goals of older adults to guide clinical practice.Implications for rehabilitationLow vision has an impact on the activity level of older adults, consistently identified in the areas of walking and moving around in different locations and reading for knowledge and leisure.At the participation level, the impact of low vision is less frequently identified compared to the areas identified at the activity level, in the areas of leisure, social interactions and basic and instrumental ADL.Rehabilitation therapists working with older adults with low vision should assess clients' performance of moving around in different locations, in addition to walking, and include screening questions on the impact of low vision on driving.Rehabilitation therapists working with older adults with low vision should determine clients' reading needs and acquire competence in assessing clients' reading ability and providing intervention for different types of reading to enable them to continue participating in various life situations that require the performance of reading.

Description of a return-to-work occupational therapy programme for stroke rehabilitation in Singapore.

Stroke is the fourth leading cause of death and the major cause of disability in Singapore. The number of stroke survivors is expected to rise with the increase in the ageing population. This paper describes how occupational therapists are involved in stroke and work rehabilitation in Singapore. A retrospective study of stroke clients referred to a vocational assessment unit in 2004 showed that 55% of the clients were able to return to work. The majority of the clients changed their job positions from blue-collar workers to clerical workers. On the other hand, the main reasons for poor outcome were: unfit to work in general, needed further rehabilitation, further medical care was indicated, failed to meet appointments and withdrawal from the job trial. Three case vignettes are discussed to illustrate the multifactorial aspects influencing positive work outcomes. Further research is needed in exploring the factors that affect stroke rehabilitation and return-to-work outcomes.